gaiarady

I am in wonder at the sheer pessimism which seems to pervade the attitudes of most people. People in this world have grown accustomed to warfare, to violence, to being apathetic and disappointed with the state of the world and with the behaviour of others — indeed, it seems most people can’t even get their head around the concept of leaders/authority figures who are –not- degenerate and morally compromised, ready to exploit the gullibility of their subjects at a moments notice to profit personally.

It baffles my imagination that people would argue against living under the rule of those people who are the most wise – which is to say, those people who observe objective reality and who devise laws and government based on the self-evident natural laws of the Universe, which anyone can discern for themselves if they simply employ the use of logic and rigorous examination of this multi-faceted world we live in.

When did people become so disillusioned with life that they are no longer willing to even strive for something better? And to get back to the question at hand: why are people so damn convinced that a despotism of the wise would be a bad thing? It seems to make logical sense that having the wisest people among you be your leaders and comprise your government would be a very fine idea – for any civilization, at any level of evolution.

These same people are adamant ‘believers’ in the evil philosophy of democracy, which really amounts to nothing more than mob rule. When the uneducated mob has the power to make decisions, they choose according to what they ‘believe’ in, rather than according to what is just, true, and in accordance with reality. This leads to the election of degenerate criminals the likes of which will soon start a third world war for their own profit (what that might be is open to speculation).

In comparison, being ruled by a despotism of the wise, who base their laws on logic and objective truth, and who are also under extreme duress to be morally upright and completely honest, just seems like a better idea altogether.

I really think most people could be brought about to agree with the idea of being ruled by those who are most intelligent and wise among them, but they come up short of proving themselves to be truly intelligent or understanding of the logic behind why. The most obvious sign of the average person’s inability to see reason is inherent in their inability to address overpopulation or accept what is the most just and humane way of countering it.

The way to curb overpopulation, in a humane, just, and expedient fashion is simple: there must be laws made concerning who is and who is not capable of adequately raising a child, and therefore who is and who is not allowed to reproduce. Given that we have a 6.5 BILLION surplus population, it is mandatory that effective measures be taken in all countries of the world, from the so-called pillars of civilization to the horror-ridden third world countries.

By enforcing strict laws governing who can and who can not have children, we would not only limit our population drastically in a comparatively short time-frame, but we would also increase the overall standard of living as well as increase manifold the quality of life and quality of character of the future generations of this planet.

It stands to reason that if a child is to develop healthfully and to its utmost potential, then that child must have its physical/material, emotional, and spiritual needs taken care of. To develop properly, children need a mother and father who love one another, who behave harmoniously with one another, and who are psychologically stable. Children must be raised by level-headed and even-handed adults who are aware of their immense responsibility for bringing up the next generation of humankind in a just fashion.

That is not to say that there are not the odd exceptions to the rule; children who cope with bad circumstances and in the end emerge more or less unscathed, but it is no longer acceptable to justify inflicting emotional, physical, and/or psychological abuse upon millions of children for the sake of the odd genius that crops up.

Naturally, the best way to enforce this kind of population control and limited births would be by means of mass, mandatory sterilizations which, for all intents and purposes, are permanent. Although the technology may not exist at this point in time, I am certain that within a few years time we will have the technology to sterilize people, effectively forever, but with the option to undo the procedure should two people prove they are capable of being good, decent parents to their potential children.

In this way, costly and emotion-wrenching abortions would be done away with, and many, many people would be freed from the risk of unwanted pregnancies and even the expectation of having children for the sake of having children. Only those people who are truly fit to raise children correctly would be allowed to reproduce, and in this way all those people who should be devoting their time to personal education, evolution, and fulfillment would have it to do so.

Not only would the population of the planet be allowed to decrease by leaps and bounds in a peaceful manner, but at the same time the standard of living and quality of life would rise exponentially as children were born into the optimal circumstances instead of the sub-prime and downright inhumane. A huge majority of the population would simply grow old and die of natural causes with no one to replace them, and at the same time those people who were being born would be born into circumstances that best facilitate their education about real matters of importance, that they may live in peace, harmony, and with integrity as human beings – rather than living in a state of constant struggle, deprivation, and abuse which never lends well to positive development.

The inability of the average earth human to confront objective reality, and so to confront these matters, with honesty and according to logic, is astounding, and only leads them to more suffering and unnecessary anguish. Despite the fact that one must have a license to drive a car, or a medical degree to be a doctor, there is not one single law mandating who is and who is not suitably capable of raising a child. It makes no sense when one considers that the children of today are the adults of tomorrow, and therefore we should be raising them to be the very best they can be.

Instead, we allow anyone who wants to, to have children. It doesn’t matter if they have AIDS, or if they suffer from Borderline Personality Disorder, Antisocial Disorder, or any other serious psychological affliction. Pregnant women, although advised not to, are allowed to drink, to smoke, to eat growth-hormone pumped factory-farmed meat, take medication both prescribed and over-the-counter, etc. etc. Unmarried and single parents abound, while the rate of divorce soars ever higher with the passage of time.

It is practically the norm these days for Americans to come from broken homes, and it’s unacceptable. No two people should be allowed to get married until they prove they truly love one another and are capable of staying together the duration of their lives. Marriage, in turn, should be a mandatory pre-requisite for having children. Sperm banks and IVF should be illegal, as removing sperm and eggs from the human body and storing them for any period of time causes mutations in the genes and other complications which our scientists do not fully understand yet, let alone know how to deal with.

Most people who read this will likely begin foaming at the mouths when they realize what is being suggested: that having children is not a fundamental human right, and the very real, concrete rights and needs of the potential child come long before any imagined ‘need’ of the potential parent(s) to have children. Unfortunately for those who are offended by this, the only reason they are offended is because they are out of touch with reality and wish, for some reason, to deceive themselves about objective truth.

Trackback URI | Comments RSS