More dead and wounded. More unhappiness, more heartache, more suffering and misery, more warfare. More lies, and always more rampant, unchecked violence. More people lashing out at one another, out of control and completely without direction, without cause or motivation. By the billions, how they groan and sulk and feel pity for themselves.
You are without comprehension of anything, from the simplest of matters to the most complex — and be no more foolish than you already are, for the simplest of things are as important as the rest. How can you understand anything which is complex, without first understanding the parts which make it up?
There is a difference between talk and action. Consider the Dalai Lama — for all his talk of peace, for all his nice-sounding words, etc. look at the suffering he causes his people. If he were a true spiritual leader, uninterested in political office or standing, rather than the scoundrel he is, then he would not strive with such ambition to see Tibet divided when all it causes is the suffering of those he calls his people. Not to mention, the guy was literally chummy with Nazis. C’mon folks…
Or more classically, the abusive partner who claims to love you. Better still, the mother who proclaims that her love for her children is unconditional — yet she rages, yet she screams and lashes out, yet she spits horrible, vile words in their faces and calls them every nasty name she can think of at them, in her anger she seeks to destroy them… That is not unconditional love. That is not caring, not kind.
It’s not love at all. To walk a tight-rope over an abyss in an effort to navigate the rages of one’s fellow human being, especially when that human being is someone close who should be loved, trusted and reliable — that indicates something very wrong indeed.
Being parasitically needy, unable to sustain ones own self-image and fearful of abandonment (and as a result of that powerful fear, willing to manipulate others) is also not love. It is not protecting someone, nor loving them, to enable such behaviour, either. To sacrifice oneself constantly in a parasitic relationship is unhealthy for both parties.
Yet this is the order of the day. This is normality, and the herd will cull itself of anyone who does not conform. The prisons will overflow with the psychologically-damaged, with the drug-addicted, with the political dissidents and the undesirables, and with everyone in-between, alongside all those innocently-convicted humans… that is already how it is.
Yet the world is full of emotionally abusive parents. Humans who bring children into the world only to neglect them, to demean them, to dehumanize them, to indoctrinate them with their sick religions, to seek to mold them and to punish them for not conforming to that mold — yes, the world is full of people who will abandon their children, who will negate their perspective, who will invalidate their emotions… people who will systemically torture their offspring, undetected by the justice system and without reprimand.
And you people would oppose strict birth control measures — the kind where the majority of people (like you, in all likelihood) would not be allowed to reproduce. On what grounds? On the ground that reproducing is an inalienable human right? Well, the rights of the children trump the imagined rights of the adults, so no. It’s not an inalienable human right.
So on what ground? On the ground that by not allowing people to have children, you are depriving the potential children of their life? Wrong again, but until the population understand reincarnation, they’ll never understand why. The fact of the matter is this: reincarnation is a fact, a ’scientifically provable’ one at that. Because we know we reincarnate, the premise that one is depriving humans of the chance to live by controlling the circumstances into which adults are allowed to procreate, into which they bring another person who will be helpless and wholly reliant upon their ability to provide the proper care (from nutrition, to housing, to education, to love, etc.) — is to be thrown out, for it is a false stance.
Allowing children to be born into inhumane circumstances, to be abused, only causes us to develop one after another generation of degenerating adults who act out of control and without thought or care or guidance. It brings the whole of mankind down. Only by recognizing that the children are our future (a fact which the most powerful among us certainly know) will society make any progress.
Our children cannot prosper in an overpopulated world. Look at us now — we are wasting, we are suffering and driving headlong and blindly into war. It will only get worse with time, at the rate we are going… we’re lucky we haven’t blown up our planet at this point.
I’m tired of the feeble excuses of why it’s too hard, or people just can’t do it. I’m tired of actions standing plain in the face of words, yet the words winning out. I have grown sick of the duplicity, of the ruling chaos, of the amoral actions of the unchecked masses.
Furthermore, I tire of Israel. Truly, I tire of all the fanaticism, and I wish that those of a religious-fanatic persuasion could at least direct their fanatic urges toward the positive aspects of their religion, for don’t virtually all religions have in common some good aspects? Like the golden rule: do unto others as you would have others do unto you.
Now, falsely interpreted one might think that they should (if they wish to abide by this rule) run about giving to everyone they encounter… but such a person will soon find themselves homeless and starving. Correctly interpreted, one understands that the golden rule is to do unto others as you would have others do unto you if you were in their same position. If you were an ignorant fool, would you wish to be told the truth, or would you wish to be deceived and misled?
If you were behaving dogmatically about something which was false, insisting for instance that the Earth was flat and you could fall off the edge — would you wish for someone to correct you, or would you wish to be left as you are?
The average person does not understand what it means to do unto others as they would have others do unto them. Indeed, at this point I would wager that the average person finds the word ‘unto’ to be archaic. The average person, being nice, is an idiot.
So it is. The people are ignorant, willingly self-deceiving fools — and their leaders are exploitative, ravenous predators. One may deserve the other, but it is disappointing all the same.